arrow 2008 columns
  arrow 2006 columns
  arrow 2005 columns
  Back to Home
   
arrow 12/29/07 - The gift card shuffle
arrow 12/22/07 - Tracking the mild coyote
arrow 12/15/07 - Knocked up but not out
arrow 12/08/07 - Save the world: stay married
arrow 12/01/07 - The Red Cross' latest emergency
arrow 11/24/07 - No more reading the readers
arrow 11/17/07 - Pictures imperfect
arrow 11/10/07 - Shelter Mag Blues
arrow 11/03/07 - The Tao of Blowhards
arrow 10/27/07 - Cliche and cataclysm
arrow 10/20/07 - The Porn Age's unsexiness
arrow 10/13/07 - Art as child's play
arrow 10/06/07 - Did 9/11 kill feminism?
arrow 09/29/07 - Everyone's a 'genius'
arrow 09/22/07 - Live and let live -- nah . . .
arrow 09/15/07 - Should kids be seen?
arrow 09/08/07 - Defending Jerry Lewis
arrow 09/01/07 - Our wonder of Wonder Bread
arrow 08/25/07 - American Apparel's ick
arrow 08/18/07 - Death by numbers
arrow 08/11/07 - When Hillary met Robert
arrow 08/04/07 - The case for conspiracies
arrow 07/28/07 - A) Do you love polls, or b) are you weird?
arrow 07/21/07 - Good ... and smug
arrow 07/14/07 - The little black dress of 'responsibility'
arrow 07/07/07 - Little voices of distraction
arrow 06/30/07 - Who killed Antioch? Womyn
arrow 06/23/07 - 40-love, or 20-love?
arrow 06/16/07 - Our blond obsession, from Di to Paris
arrow 06/09/07 - Down the aisle and over the top
arrow 06/02/07 - Dr. Death, American icon
arrow 05/26/07 - Curse of the normal
arrow 05/19/07 - Without smoking, films lose some fire
arrow 05/12/07 - Palm Tuesday
arrow 05/05/07 - Write free and get locked up
arrow 04/28/07 - Does getting him a beer count as work?
arrow 04/21/07 - Try this wrinkle: Grow up
arrow 04/14/07 - NBC flop could be a hit -- on HBO
arrow 04/09/07 - Why doesn't Harvard love me?
arrow 04/02/07 - Attack of the Killer Memoir
arrow 03/26/07 - Dreaming your dream house
arrow 03/19/07 - Documentaries or propaganda?
arrow 03/12/07 - Sleep at your own risk
arrow 03/03/07 - What a card!
arrow 02/24/07 - Echo Park in Mexico
arrow 02/17/07 - Fame-iness
arrow 02/10/07 - I'm with Cupid
arrow 02/03/07 - What Hillary's humor reveals
arrow 01/27/07 - Doggy gentrification
arrow 01/20/07 - Wanna be happy? Expect the worst
arrow 01/13/07 - Adam Carolla's genius -- spoiled
arrow 01/06/07 - The books that read women
 
     

A) Do you love polls, or b) are you weird?
Why are we obsessed with popular opinion on so many trivial questions?
July 28, 2007
You'll never believe this: College students under the age of 21 who have fake IDs are more likely to drink alcohol than those who don't. A University of Missouri-Columbia study, which surveyed more than 3,700 students, found that ownership of fake IDs increased by nearly 20% over the course of four semesters and led to increased alcohol consumption. What's more (this will blow your mind), members of fraternities and sororities were more likely to have fake IDs than non-Greeks.
Who funds studies like this? The National Council on the Completely Obvious?
How about the Center for Recognizing the Sad Truth About What Gets People's Attention? As anyone who's watched a reality show, visited a website or even called the cable company lately knows ("You've been selected to participate in a quality-control survey!"), polls are hot. No longer limited to dry political inquiries in newspapers and marketing surveys about cleaning products, polls don't just reflect public opinion, they reflect our fascination with the whole concept of public opinion -- mostly our own.
Whether we're sounding off about healthcare reform, taking a Glamour magazine "Are you normal?" poll or posting a survey on our MySpace page about whether those pants go with that shirt, what often seems most compelling is not the subject at hand but the feeling of participating, the group thing, the vague stirrings of a democratic process. Never mind that the subject matter is often stupefyingly trivial and the results are about as scientific as interpretive dance. Take, for instance, the recently launched BuzzDash.com, which offers thousands of live, anonymous polls about a host of subjects. Questions range from "Should universal healthcare cover illegal immigrants?" to "Women: would you rather be with a man who is a) very hairy or b) overweight (at last check, hirsute gentlemen were leading by 22%).
BuzzDash founder David Gerken says he wants the site to be the go-to place for anyone who wants to "gauge the pulse of the nation."
"We each only have our own perspective on things," he said. "The Internet lends itself to getting perspectives from broad groups of people. You can get a mainstream poll from someplace like USA Today, but we deal not only with headline issues but human-interest and everyday types of issues. Like, for instance, 'Do you think you're weird?' "
As of a few days ago, 65% of the 742 people who had participated in BuzzDash's "Do you think you're weird?" poll had classified themselves as such. "I consider myself weirdly alluring," went one comment (of course, just answering the question won't do; there must be comments). "It would be weird not to think you're weird," said another.

No wonder the American public loves polls so much. They provide the invaluable service of reminding us we're not alone in the world. Whether we're tracking trends on Technorati.com or answering the question "Are farts funny?" (70% of respondents on a sports fan website say yes), polls let us see that, no matter what our opinions, there are always a few other folks sharing our tiny slice of the pie chart.

But as nice as it is to have company in the minority, everyone knows real gratification comes from being in the majority. And given the number of polls we could participate in daily, we have no dearth of opportunities to secure a place in the mainstream. Feeling freakish because you support Ron Paul or Mike Gravel for president? Don't worry, BuzzDash's "What would you prefer, losing a hand or an eye?" poll may well put you back inside the margins.
Ultimately, polls and surveys celebrate normalcy. And while their popularity has been enabled by the Internet, it's worth remembering that our love of averages (and, by extension, our averageness) predates Google Trends. In his 1981 essay, "Within the Context of No Context," the legendary media critic George W.S. Trow equated the downfall of society to a popular survey-based television game show. Pointing to "the moment in which Richard Dawson, the host of a terrible program called 'Family Feud,' asked someone what he thought the audience would say the average was," Trow lamented that there was "no reality whatsoever. No fact anywhere in sight."
The funny thing is, you don't need a survey to figure that out. If you're a researcher at the University of Missouri, it's probably enough to ask a bartender.
© Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times
 
© 2008, Meghan Daum
 
Meghan Daum Quality of Life Report