arrow 2010 columns
  arrow 2009 columns
  arrow 2008 columns
  arrow 2006 columns
  arrow 2005 columns
  Back to Home
   
arrow 12/29/07 - The gift card shuffle
arrow 12/22/07 - Tracking the mild coyote
arrow 12/15/07 - Knocked up but not out
arrow 12/08/07 - Save the world: stay married
arrow 12/01/07 - The Red Cross' latest emergency
arrow 11/24/07 - No more reading the readers
arrow 11/17/07 - Pictures imperfect
arrow 11/10/07 - Shelter Mag Blues
arrow 11/03/07 - The Tao of Blowhards
arrow 10/27/07 - Cliche and cataclysm
arrow 10/20/07 - The Porn Age's unsexiness
arrow 10/13/07 - Art as child's play
arrow 10/06/07 - Did 9/11 kill feminism?
arrow 09/29/07 - Everyone's a 'genius'
arrow 09/22/07 - Live and let live -- nah . . .
arrow 09/15/07 - Should kids be seen?
arrow 09/08/07 - Defending Jerry Lewis
arrow 09/01/07 - Our wonder of Wonder Bread
arrow 08/25/07 - American Apparel's ick
arrow 08/18/07 - Death by numbers
arrow 08/11/07 - When Hillary met Robert
arrow 08/04/07 - The case for conspiracies
arrow 07/28/07 - A) Do you love polls, or b) are you weird?
arrow 07/21/07 - Good ... and smug
arrow 07/14/07 - The little black dress of 'responsibility'
arrow 07/07/07 - Little voices of distraction
arrow 06/30/07 - Who killed Antioch? Womyn
arrow 06/23/07 - 40-love, or 20-love?
arrow 06/16/07 - Our blond obsession, from Di to Paris
arrow 06/09/07 - Down the aisle and over the top
arrow 06/02/07 - Dr. Death, American icon
arrow 05/26/07 - Curse of the normal
arrow 05/19/07 - Without smoking, films lose some fire
arrow 05/12/07 - Palm Tuesday
arrow 05/05/07 - Write free and get locked up
arrow 04/28/07 - Does getting him a beer count as work?
arrow 04/21/07 - Try this wrinkle: Grow up
arrow 04/14/07 - NBC flop could be a hit -- on HBO
arrow 04/09/07 - Why doesn't Harvard love me?
arrow 04/02/07 - Attack of the Killer Memoir
arrow 03/26/07 - Dreaming your dream house
arrow 03/19/07 - Documentaries or propaganda?
arrow 03/12/07 - Sleep at your own risk
arrow 03/03/07 - What a card!
arrow 02/24/07 - Echo Park in Mexico
arrow 02/17/07 - Fame-iness
arrow 02/10/07 - I'm with Cupid
arrow 02/03/07 - What Hillary's humor reveals
arrow 01/27/07 - Doggy gentrification
arrow 01/20/07 - Wanna be happy? Expect the worst
arrow 01/13/07 - Adam Carolla's genius -- spoiled
arrow 01/06/07 - The books that read women
 
     
Echo Park in Mexico
Like many L.A. neighborhoods, San Miguel de Allende is being remade by well-heeled Americans.
February 24, 2007
I SPENT LAST Sunday in San Miguel de Allende, Mexico, with a group of more than 500 Americans gawking at the designer homes of other Americans.
Needless to say, I was thrilled to learn about this particular tourist activity. Being away from home is unsettling enough, but being away on a Sunday and missing out on open-house tours is downright colon-blocking. What good is a weekend, after all, that does not include at least one voyeuristic jaunt into the home of a stranger? Why go to a stuffy museum or the bug-infested park when you can fondle people's countertops with impunity?
Americans know that open houses aren't just the new museums, they're the new church! The people of San Miguel de Allende know that too, because a lot of them are Americans. Nestled in the mountains of eastern Guanajuato state, San Miguel has a population of about 100,000, a sizable portion of which comes from the U.S. or Canada. To maneuver along the narrow cobblestone sidewalks of San Miguel is to hear purse-clutching English speakers rhapsodizing about a new deodorant or comparing a Jaguar parked on the street to the one they keep back in the States.
Because many of the property owners shuttle between San Miguel and their El Norte homelands, it's hard to tell exactly how big the gringo invasion is. When I arrived, my friend the B&B owner said it was 7% of the population. A few days later, a taxi driver told me 15%. When I got home, I checked Wikipedia, which says expatriates (mostly U.S. nationals) may be 40% to 50% of the population. A fourfold increase in less than a week! Now that's growth.
You can usually tell how well a place is doing by the way its citizens entertain themselves. If keno parlors and dive bars that double as pancake houses are hallmarks of dying towns, wealthier places can be discerned by the availability of paint-your-own-ceramic-pot studios and the enthusiasm people bring to the Sunday open house.
And because the only thing affluent San Miguel de Allende residents seem to love more than ceramics are designer homes in which they can display them, a bunch of smart full- and part-time expats got together and created the House and Garden Tour. It operates nearly every Sunday, and anyone with $15 (which benefits the public library) can pile into buses and be ferried around for a fix of high-end local color.
Everyone, even the property owners, wears name tags identifying home cities or states. I heard one Oregonian describe to another her half-price Mexican face-lift. Minnesotans talked wind chill with other Minnesotans. I found a guy from West Hollywood, and we rode together like an exclusive little clique, comparing different neighborhoods in L.A. and dishing Britney Spears.
The first house we visited was a sprawling, boxy, contemporary estate about 15 miles outside of town. It was owned by a ceramic artist and relationship-book author from the Bay Area. and was notable for, among other things, a master suite with an indoor/outdoor shower and a bathtub shaped exactly to the relationship-book author's proportions. There was a separate art studio, an infinity pool and a dog-washing bathroom.
The second house, a new colonial-style manse with papyrus waving in the garden, was in town on a street so narrow that we had to walk four blocks from the bus to reach it. As we marched through a park, children played nearby, a couple of actual Mexicans talked animatedly on their cellphones and a 1980s Wham! song played in the background — the one with George Michael singing the line "guilty feet have got no rhythm," only the melody was played by a pan flute to give it a kind of south-of-the-border flavor.
It was at this point that I realized that if I really wanted a taste of Mexico, I might as well go home to Echo Park. The tour wasn't so much a backstage pass to aspirational cultural immersion as it was an English-only how-to guide for getting away from it all without giving anything up. Each dwelling was mostly notable for just how thoroughly the householders had managed to bring the comforts of the north into the wilds of the south.
I also realized that there was a certain irrelevance, even tedium, to touring a house that wasn't for sale (as fun as it was to spy on someone's dog-washing bathroom). That's because no matter how unaffordable, impractical or downright awful a house may be, if it's for sale, it carries an unmistakable aura of possibility. It also makes us think about our values and tastes, our financial stability, our courage and our fears. We're forced, if even on an abstract level, to consider the bigger picture — property taxes, the school system, commute times to work. Or even potable water.
Getting inside a house that's for sale is kind of like dating someone who's single and available, whereas walking into a house just to admire its superior design (and the cash it took it implement it) is like mooning over a celebrity. It's a nice distraction for a while, but then you feel kind of stupid.
Maybe that's why I've been feeling a little dull since I returned home (or maybe it's that I still have the Wham! song in my head). Thank God tomorrow's Sunday. There are a couple houses with "for sale" signs on them that I can't wait to check out. I've also got this great idea for a new bathroom.
© Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times
 
© 2010, Meghan Daum
 
Meghan Daum Quality of Life Report