Her flat-footed attempts
at being funny expose a double standard for ambitious women.
February
3, 2007
THIS WEEK,
Hillary Clinton tried out a joke in Iowa. "We face a lot of
evil men," she told voters in Davenport. "People like
Osama bin Laden come to mind. And what in my background equips
me to deal with evil and bad men?" Clinton then smiled big
and chortled, cueing the audience that this was not an oral presentation
in a women's studies class but, indeed, a joke.
Questioned
later by reporters, who weren't sure if they got it, Clinton said: "You
guys keep telling me, 'Lighten up! Be funny!' I get a little funny
and now I'm being psychoanalyzed."
The clip
made the expected blogospheric rounds and wound up on "The
Daily Show," but I think the only psychoanalysis this incident
warrants is an examination of just why Clinton's search for a sense
of humor has been tougher than locating a lost contact lens in
the Dead Sea.
Surely it
shouldn't be this hard. Just about every profile ever written about
her has quoted friends and colleagues who point out her sense of
humor, frequently prefaced with the word "wicked." Where's
all that cutting hilarity when the world is telling her to "lighten
up?"
It's possible,
I suppose, that Clinton's friends' taste in humor is such that
coy jabs at her husband (or could it be Newt? Or Kenneth Starr?
Or President Bush himself?) passes for biting wit. But it's more
likely that her flat footedness is a symptom of a double standard
that rarely comes up in conversations about the challenges faced
by powerful women. If there's anything that can hinder a woman's
credibility faster than becoming visibly pregnant or getting caught
watching Lifetime, it's revealing the ability to be genuinely funny.
Of course,
in politics, men have never exactly given Oscar Wilde a run for
his money either. Considering that, in 1996, Bob Dole was the wryest
guy on the national campaign trail since, well, all the other times
he ran for president or vice president, we should know better than
to expect constant knee-slappers from these folks, at least intentional
ones. But Clinton's problems have been thrown into high relief
because her chief competitor for the Democratic presidential nomination,
Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, appears to be as charismatic as she
is stiff.
Obama has
yet to let his handlers drive him into poll-driven blandness; so
far, he looks like a natural. And although we don't know whether
he has the chops to sell himself as president, his body language
suggests that he's not working quite as hard as Clinton is. Stoop-shouldered
and never quite sure what to do with his hands, Obama resembles
the goofy math geek whom the girls had secret crushes on in high
school because he made them laugh.
Clinton,
hyper-focused wonk that she is, has a personality that has long
appeared to be the product of focus groups and advisors from the
Professor Henry Higgins Finishing School for Formerly Radical Broads.
She has been so ravaged by the media, the public and, it would
seem, her own perfectionism that she comes across less as a human
being than as a historical figure whose legacy depends on keeping
her humanity out of the equation.
It's possible
she's right about that. But the fact that we're seeing a black
candidate who seems infinitely more relaxed with himself than his
female competitor speaks volumes about just how much we're likely
to punish women who step outside the bounds of corporate-flavored
gravitas.
Part of this
is Clinton's own fault — the very act of saying "you
keep telling me to be funny" is depressing evidence of her
burdensome self-consciousness. But then again, female humor is
easily bent into the worst cliches about women. Funny men, after
all, are considered smart, confident and sexy. But wisecracking
chicks risk accusations of bitterness, hormonal instability and
the assumption (no matter what they look like) that they're using
wit to compensate for physical unattractiveness.
As a result,
a lot of ambitious women have been conditioned not only to tone
the comedy down (remember the old dating adage, "Laugh at his jokes, but don't be funnier
than him"?) but to resist witty self-deprecation, a genre that
some old-school feminists were too tin-eared to interpret as anything
other than a sign of low self-esteem. What's left is stridency, earnestness
and painstakingly rehearsed jokes ripe for reducing to male-bashing
sound bites. The effect: the Cathy comic strip character with a campaign
bus. Ouch.
Is Clinton
funny deep down? I'm willing to bet she is, only because I doubt
she could have survived the last 15 years without either a sense
of humor or a serious Quaalude habit. But I'd also bet most of
us will never see it, no matter how hard she tries. Even if she
learns how to tell a joke, the colluding forces of media savagery,
Washington banality and a culture in which female power is not
yet entirely compatible with having a real personality will render
her something less than human. Will it cost her the nomination?
Who knows. But it's already cost her much more than that.