2008 columns
    2007 columns
    2005 columns
  Back to Home
   
a53 12/30/06 - Half the resolution is optimism
a52 12/23/06 - As the solstice turns
a51 12/16/06 - Shopping for Person X
a50 12/09/06 - My dinner with Joni
a49 12/02/06 - Want quirky sex? Turn to fiction
a48 11/25/06 - For whom the biological clock ticketh
a47 11/18/06 - Eviting trouble
a46 11/11/06 - More information, less reading
a45 11/04/06 - Slogans over sentences
a44 10/28/06 - Avid consumers, or just crazy?
a43 10/21/06 - Road Rage on Information Superhighway
a42 10/14/06 - The State of Student Activism
a41 10/07/06 - $4k Cat Is Nothing to Sneeze At
a40 09/30/06 - Housing Party Collapses
a39 09/23/06 - TiVo Tyranny -- The Latest in Self-Loathing
a38 09/16/06 - What's Do-ing in Fashion
a37 09/09/06 - Gentlemen, Start Your Clocks
a36 09/02/06 - Celebrating Labor -- by Working
a35 08/26/06 - JonBenet Wasn't the Only Victim
a34 08/19/06 - Jack FM May Be Annoying, But Jill's an Airhead
a33 08/12/06 - The Upside of Marrying Down
a32 08/05/06 - The Dope In All Of Us
a31 07/29/06 - Sweating Your Way to Enlightenment
a30 07/22/06 - Can't Get Enough Baby Talk
a29 07/15/06 - Behind Batwoman's Gayness
a28 07/08/06 - I'm with Google
a27 07/01/06 - Sadists in stilettoes
a26 06/24/06 - Coulter's a satirist -- really?
a25 06/17/06 - Models hawking model homes
a24 06/10/06 - Eyesores of L.A.
a23 06/03/06 - Lies, damn lies and marriage statistics
a22 05/27/06 - The Madonna diet
a21 05/20/06 - Goodbye to you, Mr. Smiley
a20 05/13/06 - Men with weak chins
a19 05/06/06 - Man of our dreams
a18 04/29/06 - Kaavya's so not happy ending
a17 04/22/06 - Guilty moms, the next generation
a16 04/15/06 - Major decisions for minors
a15 04/08/06 - Surveying the cultural manscape
a14 04/01/06 - Hedgehog nation
a13 03/25/06 - Sticky family values
a12 03/18/06 - Love 'em, hate 'em or clean the house
a11 03/11/06 - Middle school confidential
a10 03/04/06 - Crowding out a right to choose
a9 02/25/06 - Who's the idiot now?
a8 02/18/06 - Zillowing hits you where you live
a7 02/11/06 - The No-Om Zone: Yoga for Winners
a6 02/04/06 - Wrestling with the 'Heidi' effect
a5 01/28/06 - Harassed, or just bummed?
a4 01/21/06 - Public radio, private lives
a3 01/14/06 - Throwing the book at reality
a2 01/07/06 - A breakthrough called 'Brokeback'
a1 01/02/06 - Evolving resolving
 
     
Love 'em, hate 'em or clean the house
One book takes potshots at powerful women, the other makes them blandly innocuous. Choose your poison.
March 18 2006
CALL ME A masochist, but I spent last weekend reading a book called "Women Who Make the World Worse: and How their Radical Feminist Assault Is Ruining Our Schools, Families, Military, and Sports."
I knew I really should have been dusting the blades of my ceiling fan, but after months of hearing about author Kate O'Beirne and her "battles with the man-hating 'sisterhood,' " I figured it was time I saw what the fuss was about.
O'Beirne, the Washington editor of the National Review and former vice president of the Heritage Foundation, is by many accounts a charming and witty person. In a recent interview with Salon.com, she justified her views by saying, "I think we were better protected by traditional mores and chivalry than we are by laws and lawsuits."
Fair enough. But between the hard covers of her book (illustrated with caricatures of Ruth Bader Ginsberg and "Sex and the City's" Carrie Bradshaw that border on the anti-Semitic), this sentiment apparently translates into the notion that all assertive women are litigious, motherhood-resistant and either oversexed or undersexed. Peppered with didactic pronouncements — "the modern women's movement is totalitarian in its methods, radical in its aims and dishonest in its advocacy" — and chestnuts from the fringes of 1970s-era extremism (she refers to feminist scholar Catharine MacKinnon's line about all heterosexual sex being rape, which is actually a notorious misquote), O'Beirne's book did for me what no book had done in a long time. It made me want to dust my ceiling fan.
Perhaps that was her aim — sneaky gal! For a brief moment, I abandoned all my professional goals and castration fantasies, seized by the urge to clean.
But no sooner did I go in search of a feather duster than I stumbled on another book I'd been meaning to read. This was Karenna Gore Schiff's "Lighting the Way: Nine Women Who Changed Modern America," which studiously chronicles the achievements of women such as anti-lynching crusader Ida B. Wells-Barnett, labor organizer Mary Harris "Mother" Jones and United Farm Workers' organizer Dolores Huerta. Realizing I had no feather duster, I lay back down on the couch, read about 50 pages and promptly fell asleep.
I had the strangest dream: The women who made the world worse were in a roller derby match against the women who changed modern America. The "worse" women, unencumbered by the Industrial Revolution-era corsets of some of their opponents, were at a distinct advantage. This was thanks not only to the athletic opportunities afforded them by Title IX (which O'Beirne believes "exacted a heavy toll on the despised sex" — which is to say, men) but because of Carrie Bradshaw, who used her Manolos as a weapon (technically illegal, but man-hating sisters don't care).
Meanwhile, Mother Jones and her posse, armed with monikers like MoJo Vixen and Ida B. Slammin', skated haplessly around the rink like Tolstoy characters. Surely there's a revolution to be fought, they were thinking, but what's with all the exposed bra straps?
When I awoke, it occurred to me that if O'Beirne had gotten her hands on the nine women who changed modern America, she would surely charge them with making the world worse. After all, Mother Jones mounted child labor demonstrations that included putting children in cages to make a point about their enslavement. Huerta cavorted with Gloria Steinem and credited the women's movement for alleviating her guilt over her two divorces, an admission that would have O'Beirne eating California grapes for a lifetime.
If O'Beirne's book amounts to a shooting gallery with the slowest-moving targets of the last half-century (McKinnon plus Jane Fonda to the power of Hillary Clinton equals … well, you do the math) Gore Schiff's book, with its bland innocuousness, is a 512-page nap. At least "Women Who Make the World Worse" kept me awake, though I'm not sure I wanted to be.
Truth be told, what I really take umbrage at (how fun to use that word "umbrage," it's so strident and Carter-era, like "patriarchy" or "carob") is the fact that despite the campaign for equality waged by the women in both books, the publishing industry still feels compelled to package their stories as if women are a special-interest group whose every thought and action is a manifestation of their pesky, capricious "gender" and its attendant "politics."
Then again, the majority of book buyers are female, so I guess these authors and publishers know what they're doing.
Interestingly, for all the powerful women into whom O'Beirne manages to dig her manicured claws, there's one she leaves notably uncensured: Oprah Winfrey. Winfrey hasn't had O'Beirne on the show, but, hey, a conservative pundit can dream. Besides, in O'Beirne's book, female breadwinners may not be all they're cracked up to be. But knowing which side that bread is buttered on? Priceless.
© Copyright 2006 Los Angeles Times
 
© 2008, Meghan Daum
 
Meghan Daum Quality of Life Report